Global Perspectives on the "Af/Pak" War
Saturday February 11th 2012

Critical Notes on Obama’s Cairo Speech: Imperialism with a Human Face

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Thank you. (Applause.) The fifth issue that we must address together is religious freedom.

Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba during the Inquisition. I saw it firsthand as a child in Indonesia, where devout Christians worshiped freely in an overwhelmingly Muslim country. That is the spirit we need today. People in every country should be free to choose and live their faith based upon the persuasion of the mind and the heart and the soul. This tolerance is essential for religion to thrive, but it’s being challenged in many different ways.

Not so much during, when Muslims (Moriscos) along with Jews were the victims of Catholic extremism, but for numerous centuries before and after the Inquisition.

Among some Muslims, there’s a disturbing tendency to measure one’s own faith by the rejection of somebody else’s faith. The richness of religious diversity must be upheld — whether it is for Maronites in Lebanon or the Copts in Egypt. (Applause.) And if we are being honest, fault lines must be closed among Muslims, as well, as the divisions between Sunni and Shia have led to tragic violence, particularly in Iraq.

This is prejudiced nonsense: look around Cairo and the diversity and tolerance you will observe will be vastly greater than in Washington, DC. Maronites in Lebanon and Copts in Egypt occupy high offices in government and business; can we say the same about Muslims in the United States? In Iraq, it has been US policy to foment discord, as part of its divide and rule policy; has Sunni Shi`ah violence increased or decreased under American occupation?

Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together. We must always examine the ways in which we protect it. For instance, in the United States, rules on charitable giving have made it harder for Muslims to fulfill their religious obligation. That’s why I’m committed to working with American Muslims to ensure that they can fulfill zakat.

This is a laudable initiative, but much more needs to be done: prejudice against Muslims is now the only sanctioned if not encouraged form of prejudice in America.

Likewise, it is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit — for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We can’t disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism.

In fact, faith should bring us together. And that’s why we’re forging service projects in America to bring together Christians, Muslims, and Jews. That’s why we welcome efforts like Saudi Arabian King Abdullah’s interfaith dialogue and Turkey’s leadership in the Alliance of Civilizations. Around the world, we can turn dialogue into interfaith service, so bridges between peoples lead to action — whether it is combating malaria in Africa, or providing relief after a natural disaster.

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Reader Feedback

2 Responses to “Critical Notes on Obama’s Cairo Speech: Imperialism with a Human Face”

  1. [...] On 14 February 1945, when King Saud met with US President Roosevelt aboard the USS Quincy in Great Bitter Lake in the Suez Canal, Roosevelt asked for the Arab King’s advice and suggestions on what could be done for European Jewry. King Saud had replied: “Give them and their descendants the choicest lands and homes of the Germans who had oppressed them.” When pressed further by Roosevelt, King Saud replied: “Make the enemy and the oppressor pay; that is how we Arabs wage war. Amends should be made by the criminal, not by the innocent bystander. What injury have Arabs done to the Jews of Europe? It is the ‘Christian’ Germans who stole their homes and lives. Let the Germans pay.” This has been the Muslim view, ever since. In the end, Roosevelt promised Ibn Saud that “the U. S. Government would make no change in its basic policy in Palestine without full and prior consultation with both Jews and Arabs.” In the event, US President Truman unilaterally reneged on Roosevelt’s promise to Ibn Saud with the explanation, “I have to answer to hundreds of thousands who are anxious for the success of Zionism; I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents.” [Source: here.] [...]

  2. [...] Critical Notes on Obama’s Cairo Speech: Imperialism with a Human Face | 7 June 2009 [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.