The sixth issue — the sixth issue that I want to address is women’s rights. (Applause.) I know –- I know — and you can tell from this audience, that there is a healthy debate about this issue. I reject the view of some in the West that a woman who chooses to cover her hair is somehow less equal, but I do believe that a woman who is denied an education is denied equality. (Applause.) And it is no coincidence that countries where women are well educated are far more likely to be prosperous.
Absolutely true, but here’s an uncomfortable fact: female literacy increased to nearly 100% in Islamic Iran, within a decade of the Revolution; something that wasn’t even remotely approached during the much longer reign of the modern, secular, American-sponsored Shah of Iran! This merits study by the American policy advisory establishment.
Now, let me be clear: Issues of women’s equality are by no means simply an issue for Islam. In Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indonesia, we’ve seen Muslim-majority countries elect a woman to lead. Meanwhile, the struggle for women’s equality continues in many aspects of American life, and in countries around the world.
I am convinced that our daughters can contribute just as much to society as our sons. (Applause.) Our common prosperity will be advanced by allowing all humanity — men and women — to reach their full potential. I do not believe that women must make the same choices as men in order to be equal, and I respect those women who choose to live their lives in traditional roles. But it should be their choice. And that is why the United States will partner with any Muslim-majority country to support expanded literacy for girls, and to help young women pursue employment through micro-financing that helps people live their dreams. (Applause.)
Micro-financing? From the sublime to the ridiculous!
No related posts.
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.










[...] On 14 February 1945, when King Saud met with US President Roosevelt aboard the USS Quincy in Great Bitter Lake in the Suez Canal, Roosevelt asked for the Arab King’s advice and suggestions on what could be done for European Jewry. King Saud had replied: “Give them and their descendants the choicest lands and homes of the Germans who had oppressed them.” When pressed further by Roosevelt, King Saud replied: “Make the enemy and the oppressor pay; that is how we Arabs wage war. Amends should be made by the criminal, not by the innocent bystander. What injury have Arabs done to the Jews of Europe? It is the ‘Christian’ Germans who stole their homes and lives. Let the Germans pay.” This has been the Muslim view, ever since. In the end, Roosevelt promised Ibn Saud that “the U. S. Government would make no change in its basic policy in Palestine without full and prior consultation with both Jews and Arabs.” In the event, US President Truman unilaterally reneged on Roosevelt’s promise to Ibn Saud with the explanation, “I have to answer to hundreds of thousands who are anxious for the success of Zionism; I do not have hundreds of thousands of Arabs among my constituents.” [Source: here.] [...]
[Translate]
[...] Critical Notes on Obama’s Cairo Speech: Imperialism with a Human Face | 7 June 2009 [...]
[Translate]